Skip to content
  • Los Angeles County
  • Riverside County
  • Orange County
  • San Bernardino County
  • San Diego County
  • The Lawyer’s Lounge
Police Misconduct & Civil Rights Lawyer
  • Law Offices of Jerry L. Steering
    4063 Birch Street, Suite 100
    Newport Beach, CA 92660
  • Phone: (949) 474-1849
    Available 24 Hour a Day
  • Free Case Evaluation

Police Misconduct Attorney

4063 Birch Street Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA 92660Phone: 949-474-1849 | Available 24 Hours A Day!
  • Home
  • Police Misconduct Articles
    • What To Do If You Have Been Beaten-Up or Falsely Arrested By The Police
    • If You’re The Victim; You’re The Enemy
    • Suing Police Officers For Violating Your Constitutional Rights
    • Suing Bad Cops And Defending Bogus Criminal Cases
    • San Bernardino County Brutality & Excessive Force Attorney
    • Jurupa Valley Police Brutality – Excessive Force Attorney
    • Long Beach Police Brutaltity Excessive Force Attorney
    • Police Misconduct Specialist; Suing Bad Cops And Defending Bogus Criminal Cases
    • Rancho Cucamonga & Chino, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Notable Criminal Cases In San Bernardino County Superior Court, That Mr. Steering Turned Around Into Civil Cases
    • Suing the Police for False Arrest in Southern California
    • Why the cops get away with it; the jury system
    • Police Brutality In Modern America; Its Root And Causes
      • Today’s Police Can Beat Or Kill Anyone, Anytime They Desire
      • Police Brutality Is Encouraged By Resisting Arrest & Battery On Officer Prosecutions
    • The King’s Soldier’s Are Back; Substitution of “Officer’s Safety” For “Probable Cause”
    • Police Misconduct Is Rampant And Condoned By Modern Police Agencies
    • Why Grand Juries Don’t Indict Police Officers?
    • The Modern Police State: “Officer’s Safety” Replaces “Probable Cause”
    • Why The Police Don’t Want Their Conduct Recorded
  • Criminal Defense
    • Cal. Penal Code Section 240; Simple Assault Lawyer
    • California Resisting Arrest Attorney
    • California Penal Code Section 148(a)(1) Lawyer
    • Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 11379, Sale of Controlled Substances
    • Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 11378; Possession of Controlled Substances for Sale
    • Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 11352 – Sale of Controlled Substances
    • Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 11377, Possession of Methamphetamine
    • Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 11350, Possession of Controlled Substances Lawyer
    • Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 11365, Drug Loitering
    • Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 11379.6, Drug Manufacturing
    • Brady List and Pitchess Motions
    • Criminal Law Practice – Generally
    • Criminal Towing Industry Cases
    • “The Law Is Crazy” – Public Misperception Of The Exclusionary Rule
    • Civil Rights Attorney
    • False Arrest Attorney in California Jerry L. Steering
      • Rancho Cucamonga – Chino Police False Arrest Attorney
      • San Diego County False Arrest Attorney
    • Resisting Arrest Cases California Lawyer
    • The “Contempt of Cop Game”; How Well Can You Play?
      • Suing Police Officers For Violating Your Constitutional Rights
      • Rancho Cucamonga – Chino Police False Arrest Attorney
        • Jerry L. Steering, Esq. – Specialist In Suing Police Officers
      • San Bernardino County Brutality & Excessive Force Attorney
      • Victorville – Apple Valley Police Brutality Attorney
      • Santa Ana, CA Police Brutality Attorney
    • California Penal Code Section 148(a)(1) Lawyer
      • Cal. Penal Code Section 69; The Hammer Of Oppression
    • Why the cops get away with it; the jury system
    • The D.A. Can Do No Wrong; Prosecutorial Immunity And The Police State
    • How To Win Your Drug Case; Go After the Cops
    • Brady List and Pitchess Motions
    • Police Misconduct Lawsuits
    • Criminal Towing Cases
    • Police Misconduct and Other Civil Rights Case Results
  • Civil Rights
    • Suing Police Officers For Violating Your Constitutional Rights
    • 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Lawsuits; Suing State Actors for Violating Federal Constitutional Rights
    • Why American’s Civil Rights Are Going, Going, Gone
      • Is It A Crime To Refuse To Identify Yourself to a Police Officer in California?
    • Civil Rights Attorney
  • Your Constitutional Rights
    • Suing Police Officers For Violating Your Constitutional Rights
    • Dirty Harry And The Criminal Procedure Counter-Revolution
    • “The Law Is Crazy” – Public Misperception Of The Exclusionary Rule
    • The Ninth Amendment Shows that “Originalist” Constitutional Interpretation is a Fraud
    • Civil Rights Attorney
      • Anaheim Civil Rights and Police Misconduct Lawyer
      • Fontana, CA Police Misconduct Attorney Jerry L. Steering
    • Why Grand Juries Don’t Indict Police Officers?
    • How The Exclusionary Rule Backfired And Crushed Americans’ Constitutional Rights.
      • Can You Sue The Police For Malicious Criminal Prosecutions?
      • The D.A. Can Do No Wrong; Prosecutorial Immunity And The Police State
      • Dirty Harry And The Criminal Procedure Counter-Revolution
      • “The Law Is Crazy” – Public Misperception Of The Exclusionary Rule
        • The Ninth Amendment Shows that “Originalist” Constitutional Interpretation is a Fraud
          • The D.A. Can Do No Wrong; Prosecutorial Immunity And The Police State
    • Why the cops get away with it; the jury system
    • Why The Police Are Not Our Friends Anymore
    • “The Law Is Crazy” – Public Misperception Of The Exclusionary Rule
    • Suing Police Officers For Violating Your Constitutional Rights
    • How to Sue the Police Department?
    • The “Contempt of Cop Game”; How Well Can You Play?
    • Police Misconduct and Other Civil Rights Case Results
    • Police Wrongful Death Cases
    • Resisting Arrest Cases California Lawyer
    • California Penal Code Section 148(a)(1) Lawyer
    • Cal. Penal Code Section 69; The Hammer Of Oppression
    • Why Grand Juries Don’t Indict Police Officers?
    • The “Contempt of Cop Game”; How Well Can You Play?
    • Why The Police Don’t Want Their Conduct Recorded
    • Why The Police Are Not Our Friends Anymore
    • Why the cops get away with it; the jury system
    • The D.A. Can Do No Wrong; Prosecutorial Immunity And The Police State
    • Excessive Force Cases
    • Police Wrongful Death Cases
    • Tasers Cases
    • Police Brutality
    • California Penal Code Section 148(a)(1) Lawyer
    • Cal. Penal Code Section 69; The Hammer Of Oppression
    • Taser Victim Attorrney
    • Excessive Force Attorney
    • Orange County Excessive Force Attorney
    • San Bernardino County Brutality & Excessive Force Attorney
    • San Diego County Police Brutality & Excessive Force Attorney
    • Excessive Force & Police Brutality Attorney – Los Angeles California
    • Anaheim Police Brutality Attorney
    • Garden Grove, CA Police Brutality Attorney
    • Huntington Beach Police Brutality Attorney
    • Santa Ana, CA Police Brutality Attorney
    • Palm Springs Police Brutality Attorney
    • Jurupa Valley Police Brutality – Excessive Force Attorney
    • Temecula Police Brutality / Excessive Force Attorney
    • Rancho Cucamonga – Chino Police Brutality Attorney
    • Victorville – Apple Valley Police Brutality Attorney
    • Oceanside Police Brutality Attorney
    • Suing the Police for False Arrest in Southern California
    • Rancho Cucamonga – Chino Police False Arrest Attorney
    • Suing Police Officers For Violating Your Constitutional Rights
    • Police Misconduct and Other Civil Rights Case Results
    • Civil Rights Attorney
    • Police Wrongful Death Cases
    • Jurupa Valley Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Santa Ana, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • San Bernardino County Brutality & Excessive Force Attorney
    • Rancho Cucamonga – Chino Police False Arrest Attorney
    • Suing the Police for False Arrest in Southern California
    • Santa Ana, CA Criminal Attorney
    • Huntington Beach Police Brutality Attorney
    • Rancho Cucamonga – Chino Police False Arrest Attorney
    • Victorville – Apple Valley Police Brutality Attorney
    • Huntington Beach Police Brutality Attorney
    • Santa Ana, CA Police Brutality Attorney
    • Santa Ana, CA Criminal Attorney
    • Jurupa Valley Criminal Attorney
    • Jurupa Valley Police Brutality – Excessive Force Attorney
    • Tasers Cases
    • Rancho Cucamonga – Chino Police False Arrest Attorney
    • Jurupa Valley Criminal Attorney
    • Police Brutality In Modern America; Its Root And Causes
    • Suing the Police for False Arrest in Southern California
    • Apple Valley, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Buena Park, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Chino Hills, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Chula Vista Police Misconduct Attorney & Specialist
    • Coronado, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Desert Hot Springs Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Huntington Beach Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Indio, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Jurupa Valley Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Laguna Beach, CA Police Misconduct Attorney Cases
    • Mission Viejo, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • National City Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Oceanside Police Misconduct Attorney & Specialist
    • Oceanside Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Ontario, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Orange County CA Police Misconduct Attorney
      • Irvine Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Palm Springs, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Santa Ana, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Huntington Beach Police Misconduct Cases
    • Recent Developments
    • Rancho Cucamonga – Chino Police False Arrest Attorney
    • Victorville – Apple Valley Police Brutality Attorney
  • Our Case Results
    • Illegal Search and Seizure
    • Injured by a Police Vehicle During a Chase?
    • Indio, CA Police Misconduct Attorney
    • Is It A Crime To Refuse To Identify Yourself to a Police Officer in California?
    • How to Beat a Controlled Buy? Go After the Police

Federal Civil Rights Lawsuits

Suing the police and defending bogus criminal cases since 1984
Police Misconduct & Civil Rights LawyerCriminal DefenseCivil Rights Cases under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.

Photo of Justices of the United States Supreme Court in Washington, DC on November 30, 2018

Jerry L. Steering is a civil rights lawyer who sues police officers and others under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 since 1984. He is an expert in these “Section 1983 cases”, and can help you obtain whatever vindication of your federal Constitutional rights is available to you based on the facts of your particular case. Almost every one of Mr. Steering’s civil rights cases involve allegations that some peace officer or other person acting under the color of state law, violated his client’s federal and/or state constitutional rights.

Free Case Evaluation

42 U.S.C.  § 1983 – THE KU KLUX KLAN ACT OF 1871 – THE THIRD ACT TO ENFORCE THE 14TH AMENDMENT.

The federal statute that persons in the United States use every day to sue police officers and other persons acting under the color of state law, is “The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871“; 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . As shown below, Section 1983 was a Reconstruction Era Law enacted by Congress to enforce the mandates of the Fourteenth Amendment and its guarantee that the protections of the federal constitution apply to persons of African descent, as well as white person. Today we use this statute to sue the police for anything from a false arrest, to a wrongful use of force by the police, to a malicious criminal prosecution, to free speech retaliation cases.

THE RECONSTRUCTION AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION; AMENDMENTS 13, 14 AND 15.

42 U.S.C. § 1983 IS A POST-CIVIL WAR STATUTE, THAT WAS ENACTED TO GIVE PERSONS OF AFRICAN DESCENT A RIGHT TO SUE FOR DAMAGES IN FEDERAL COURT FOR STATE ACTION THAT VIOLATES THEIR FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

RATIFICATION OF THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES.

In 1865 the states ratified the Thirteenth Amendment, that abolished slavery. The Thirteenth Amendment provides:

Amendment XIII , Section 1.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist in the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

RATIFICATION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

In 1868, the states ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to mandate that recently freed slaves and other persons of African descent were citizens, with the same privileges and immunities as other citizens; including due process of the law; a fundamentally fair process, before a state shall deprive any person life, liberty or property. The Fourteenth Amendment provides:

Section 1.

The All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Section 5.

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Section 5 of the 14th amendment was that constitutional provision that enabled Congress to eventually make those provisions of the Bill of Rights obligatory on the states.The 14th amendment was needed to guarantee that persons of African descent were, in fact, citizens. Section 5 of the 14th amendment provided the very jurisdiction for Congress to provide a federal civil remedy for the violation of any persons constitutional rights, by one acting under the color of state law.This “appropriate legislation” is also that very same statute that Americans use every day to sue police officers and other persons “acting under the color of state law”, who violate their federal constitutional rights. This stature is “The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871”; 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As shown below, Section 1983 was a Reconstruction Law enacted by Congress, to enforce the mandates of the fourteenth amendment and its guarantee that the protections of the federal constitution apply to persons of African descent, as well as white persons.

RATIFICATION OF THE FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

On March 30, 1870, the states ratified the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution that provides:

Amendment XV

Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

ENFORCEMENT OF THE 13TH, 14TH AND 15TH AMENDMENTS.

In the years after the Civil War, the South began to see the emergence of white terrorist groups. These

Modern Day KKK Members

organizations of composed mostly of veterans still aspiring to the goals of the Confederacy and their own Southern heritage, brought terror to freed blacks who looked to participate in the community as well as to their white allies. The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 was Congress’ attempt to put an end to the policies of terrorism, intimidation, and violence that the Klan, the Knights of the White Camelia, and the Jayhawkers had been using. The law unfortunately failed to eradicate the Klan or abolish the continued use of fear tactics and brutality against blacks and supportive whites.

Founded as a fraternal organization by Confederate veterans in Pulaski, Tennessee, in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan soon became a paramilitary group devoted to the overthrow of Republican governments in the South and the reassertion of white supremacy. Through murder, kidnapping, and violent intimidation, Klansmen sought to secure Democratic victories in elections by attacking black voters and, less frequently, white Republican leaders.

On April 20, 1971, the United States Congress enacted “An Act to enforce the Provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and for other Purposes.” This statute was a Reconstruction Era Law enacted by Congress to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee that the protections of the federal constitution apply to persons of African descent, as well as white persons. Whereas the 13th amendment abolished slavery, the 14th and amendment was needed to guarantee that persons of African descent were, in fact, recognized as citizens by the states; all of the states. The 14th amendment, however, is only a collection of words, unless the enforcement mechanism for those were was created the words of the 14th amendment were just that; words.

Ulysses S. Grant, Savior of the Republic and the 18th President of the United States

In response to Klan violence, Congress passed the first of “three Enforcement Acts” on May 31, 1870, to ensure that the provisions of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments were followed. The act, which made it a federal offense to attempt to deprive anyone of his civil rights, had little effect on the deteriorating situation. A second Enforcement Act, passed on February 28, 1871, established federal supervision over elections, but also did little to remedy the situation. After the failure in the House of a more powerful bill that would have given the federal government additional power to enforce election law, President Grant decided to intervene. The President met with Congressional leaders to urge the passage of stronger legislation, and on their recommendation, Grant issued a direct appeal to Congress requesting a new law. Grant’s appeal was successful, and Congress passed the Ku Klux Klan Act.

Also known as the “Third Enforcement Act”, the bill was a controversial expansion of federal authority, designed to give the federal government additional power to protect voters. The act established penalties in the form of fines and jail time for attempts to deprive citizens of equal protection under the laws and gave the President the authority to use federal troops and suspend the writ of habeas corpus in ensuring that civil rights were upheld.

President Grant put the new legislation to work after several Klan incidents in May. He sent additional troops to the South and suspended the writ of habeas corpus in nine counties in South Carolina. Aided by Attorney General Amos T. Akermen and the newly created Department of Justice, extensive work was done to prosecute the Klan. While relatively few convictions were obtained, the new legislation helped to suppress Klan activities and ensure a greater degree of fairness in the election of 1872.

42 U.S.C. § 1983, provides:

“Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.”

Whereas the 13th amendment abolished slavery, the 14th and amendment was that constitutional provision that enabled Congress to eventually make those provisions of the Bill of Rights obligatory on the states. The 14th amendment was needed to guarantee that persons of African descent were, in fact, citizens. Section 5 of the 14th amendment provided the very jurisdiction for Congress to provide a federal civil remedy for the violation of any person’s constitutional rights, by one acting under the color of state law; the “appropriate legislation” to enforce the 14th amendment.

SECTION 1983 CASES IN THE MODERN ERA; OUR REMEDY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS BY STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS.

Section 1983 is not itself a source of substantive Constitutional rights, but merely provides a method for vindicating federal rights conferred in the federal Constitution itself. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 393-94 (1989.) In other words, Section 1983 is a federal statute that doesn’t define any Constitutional rights, but merely provides a civil remedy for persons whose federal Constitutional rights have been violated. So, when the policeman falsely arrests you, you can sue the cop under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of your federal Constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment, as being the victim of an unreasonable seizure of your person. So, when the policeman beats-you-up for telling him that you know your rights and he has no right to search your car, you can sue him under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of your federal Constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment for an unreasonable seizure of your person under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and, for violation of your First Amendment right to free speech / right to petition government for redress of grievances, for retaliating against you for your right to protest police actions. Duran v. City of Douglas, 904 F.2d 1372 (9th Cir. 1990.)

If you believe that a government official, including police officers, violated your Constitutional rights, please contact us about your case.

WHAT YOU CAN DO.

Someone has to stand-up to the bullies of society, who think that using state police power to humiliate others, is funny, and makes them big men (or women.) There are thousands of others like you, who are good people, and have been somehow, for some reason that you could not have ever imagined, victimized by the government. It might as well be you. Stand-up for justice. Stand-up for our form of self-government. Stand-up for the spilled-blood of our fathers, who bravery died to prevent the very thing, that the government is doing to you right now.

Click on “Home”, above, or the other pages shown, for the information or assistance that we can provide for you. If you need to speak with a lawyer about your particular legal situation, please call the Law Offices of Jerry L. Steering for a free telephone consultation. Also, if you have been the victim of a False Arrest or Excessive Force by a police officer, check our Section, above, entitled: “What To Do If You Have Been Beaten-Up Or False Arrested By The Police“.

Thank you, and best of luck, whatever your needs.

Jerry L. Steering, Esq.

Law Offices of Jerry L. Steering. 4063 Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA 92660; (949) 474-1849; Fax: (949) 474-1883; jerrysteering@yahoo.com

Proudly serving these Counties and cities and otherwise throughout California.

      • Call For a Free Consultation

        Call Anytime

        If you have been arrested or abused by the police it is important to talk to a lawyer immediately to protect your freedom and your civil rights.

        Phone: (949) 474-1849

        Email: jerrysteering@yahoo.com

      • Report Police Misconduct

        Report your false arrest or abuse by the police and we will contact you for a free initial consultation.

        Get Justice * Get Even * Get Paid

    • Search SteeringLaw.com

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Mr. Steering Obtains "Sweetheart Deal" in Murder Case for Deputies' Misconduct
Read Case Details »

Jerry L. Steering


Civil Rights Lawyer Specializing in Police Misconduct and Criminal Defense; Suing Police Officers and Others for Violating Your Federal Constitutional Rights. Make the wrong step and you are out. We know where to step.

Free Case Evaluation
Article: What To Do If You Have Been Beaten-Up or Falsely Arrested By The Police?
You May Also Like These
Why The Police Don’t Want
Their Conduct Recorded
Contempt of Cop/Resisting Arrest Cases
Why The Police Are Not Our Friends Anymore
Read More Articles »
Good Morning America:
Jerry L. Steering with Diane Sawyer
Watch Video »
Police Awards & Settlements:

Alexis Segovia v. Cathedral City, U.S. District Court (Riverside) 2017; $225,000.00 for false arrest

Robert Pitt v. County of San Diego, U.S. District Court (San Diego) 2017; $220,000.00 for false arrest
In re D.D.; U.S. District Court (Los Angeles) 2017; $300,000.00 for false arrest / unreasonable force
More Awards & Settlements »

About Steering Law Firm

Jerry L. Steering has handled hundreds of police misconduct civil rights cases and the bogus criminal cases that usually accompany the same. False arrest, unreasonable force and malicious prosecution cases are a legal minefield; make the wrong step and you are out. We know where to step.

Steering Law

Law Office of Jerry L. Steering
4063 Birch Street, Suite 100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Tel: (949) 474-1849
Fax: (949) 474-1883
Email: jerrysteering@yahoo.com

Police Misconduct Areas

Concealing Evidence
Destroying Evidence
Excessive Force
False Arrest
K-9 Maulings
Malicious Prosecution
Police Beatings
Police Brutality
Police Shootings
Whistle Blower Retaliation
Wrongful Death
    •  

    •  

    •